Comments on: FauxJAX: An AJAX Framework for Idiots

By: pete watch

pete watch — Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:36:04 +0000

Hehe, Ajax was always a problem to me.. but now i can give it a try! Thanks for that!;)

pat — Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:07:50 +0000

@Klaus: yes, but they we'll get into arguments on how to pronounce it.

Klaus — Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:41:53 +0000

So may we agree on AGIF as abbreviation from now on? It’s then easier to talk about that with my boss…

Ken — Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:20:37 +0000

Hey Patrick –

If you three got together, they’d probably have to develop a new chip to handle all the zeros behind the amount you’d gather from the VCs.

pat — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:31:43 +0000

@Ben: you’re right I went a little crazy there.

Ben — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:28:56 +0000

This is far too feature rich. Web2.0 applications should do less not more. Why do you need more than one text string to say how kwel this is

DrumsNWhistles — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:53:21 +0000

It’s just what I’ve been looking for. As a geek who isn’t quite a coder, this looks to be just the thing!